3TQA: Difference between revisions
From SpinozaWiki
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==PIQT== | |||
This scan evaluates internal parameters of the scanner, including the stability of the gradient coils. This is done by scanning a phantom from which the specs are known. | This scan evaluates internal parameters of the scanner, including the stability of the gradient coils. This is done by scanning a phantom from which the specs are known. | ||
;'''Duration:''' 20 minutes | ;'''Duration:''' 20 minutes | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
==Spurious test== | |||
The spurious test evaluates whether the scanner picks up any non-scanner related radio frequency signals from the scanner room (which shouldn't be present). | The spurious test evaluates whether the scanner picks up any non-scanner related radio frequency signals from the scanner room (which shouldn't be present). | ||
;'''Duration:''' 5 minutes | ;'''Duration:''' 5 minutes | ||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
Serious problematic spurious RF issues would manifest themselves as very bright bands on the image with almost black backgrounds. The image in the previous step does NOT display this - it's an example of a completely fine test result. Image 7, on the other hand, IS an example of a problematic spurious test. | Serious problematic spurious RF issues would manifest themselves as very bright bands on the image with almost black backgrounds. The image in the previous step does NOT display this - it's an example of a completely fine test result. Image 7, on the other hand, IS an example of a problematic spurious test. | ||
==IQT== | |||
;'''Duration:''' | ;'''Duration:''' | ||
;'''Preparation:''' | ;'''Preparation:''' | ||
Line 90: | Line 92: | ||
==EPI stability== | |||
;'''Duration:''' | ;'''Duration:''' | ||
;'''Preparation:''' | ;'''Preparation:''' | ||
Line 97: | Line 99: | ||
;'''What if the EPI stability tool indicates problems:''' | ;'''What if the EPI stability tool indicates problems:''' | ||
==Helium level== | |||
;'''Duration:''' | ;'''Duration:''' | ||
;'''Preparation:''' | ;'''Preparation:''' |
Revision as of 15:58, 11 August 2022
3T QA procedure
The QA procedure contains several steps. Make sure there is no patch activated while doing them.
1) PIQT
2) Spurious test
3) IQT
4) EPI stability
5) Helium level
PIQT
This scan evaluates internal parameters of the scanner, including the stability of the gradient coils. This is done by scanning a phantom from which the specs are known.
- Duration: 20 minutes
- Preparation:
-
Photo 1
-
Photo 2
-
Photo 3
-
Photo 4
-
Photo 5
- Get the NVC head coil and 200 mm head phantom and phantom holder.
- Check whether the phantom contains air (bubbles). If so, they shouldn't be larger than about a centimes in width.
- Place the base of the coil on the patient table and remove the cushion.
- Position the phantom in the transverse orientation. The 'T' Marker on the phantom should point to the front side of the magnet as indicated by the red circle on Photo 3.Check whether the phantom is inserted correctly; it should be positioned as far back in the coil as possible (i.e. towards the bore) and it shouldn't be able to rotate sideways.
- Place the top part on the coil.
- Position the coil using the light visor; the beam must be on the horizontal line.
- Use Travel to scan plane to position the coil in the magnet center.
- How to run:
- On the scan computer: System --> SPT --> Batch Files --> PIQT
- Right-click --> Run batch
- Output:
After the PIQT scan finishes, a window pops up, ignore this window and then:
- Image view --> right click on PIQT --> generate reports.
- This generates an HTML-file with values for the tested parameters. If any values are marked in red, it means that the scanner is out-of-spec.
- Print the HTML-file as PDF and save this into scdropbox --> 3T_QA --> create a new folder with the current date (e.g. '20220803') --> 'currentdate_PIQT.pdf'
- What if the PIQT indicates problems:
There are a couple of things that you should check before reporting PIQT issues to Philips.
- Check whether the head coil is closed correctly and check whether the cable from the coil into the table is inserted correctly.
- Check whether the phantom is inserted correctly; it should be perfectly in the middle (no room to wiggle).
- Check if there is too much air (bubbles) in the PIQT phantom (larger than 1 cm).
After checking (and fixing) the above points, redo the PIQT scan and report to Philips if there are still signs of scanner issues (red values).
Spurious test
The spurious test evaluates whether the scanner picks up any non-scanner related radio frequency signals from the scanner room (which shouldn't be present).
- Duration: 5 minutes
- Preparation:
- Disconnect and remove the head coil
- Get the green/yellow wire from the back
- Put the wire lengthwise (i.e. along the direction of the bore) inside the bore, from approximately the end of the bore (it may even stick out a little, like 20 cm) until the beginning of the table. The wire simulates a subject being present in the scanner, which increases the validity/sensitivity of the spurious test by picking up spurious RF signals from outside the bore as an antenna (which wouldn't be picked up without the wire).
- How to run:
- Click on the Windows button
- Look for MR-Development
- Click 'Batch Interpreter'
- Select batch
- Select pbsviq_spurious_t30_180hz_qbc.acq
- Press start icon
- Output:
- After the scan is completed, a new subject should have been created (named 'spur T30 180 Hz/px')
- Open the new created subject in review mode by clicking patients --> open for review
- Select scan, proceed
- Click on the grid-like icon ('Switch to Thumbnail view')
- Drag the scans (each beginning with f0=127..) to the right, resulting in a single panel for each of the four scans. Your view should look something like image 6.
- Make a print-screen of the images and save this into scdropbox --> 3T_QA --> folder of current date (e.g. '20220803') --> 'currentdate_spurious.png'
- What if the spurious test indicates problems:
Serious problematic spurious RF issues would manifest themselves as very bright bands on the image with almost black backgrounds. The image in the previous step does NOT display this - it's an example of a completely fine test result. Image 7, on the other hand, IS an example of a problematic spurious test.
IQT
- Duration:
- Preparation:
- How to run:
- Output:
- What if the IQT indicates problems:
EPI stability
- Duration:
- Preparation:
- How to run:
- Output:
- What if the EPI stability tool indicates problems:
Helium level
- Duration:
- Preparation:
- How to run:
- Output:
- What if the helium level indicates problems: